InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 517
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 08/09/2019

Re: None

Thursday, 03/02/2023 10:59:36 AM

Thursday, March 02, 2023 10:59:36 AM

Post# of 75050
Why bother discussing UNESCO when you experts have declared you are correct. Nothing said here will change your mind, so why waste time arguing. It is the same with technology. The experts here have claimed SeaSearcher is a joke because it wasn't developed or tested the way they think it should have been. The experts have also ridiculously claimed that Tim Reynold's experience in geolocation and digital signal technology is not relevant to what SFRX is doing which is laughably wrong. Have you invented, developed and sold a commercial product? Have you started a tech company and successfully sold that company to a DOD contractor? No? Yet you sit in judgement of someone who has had great success doing just that. That is what an armchair technologist is. I think its great that you have experience testing products, but did you build the gear? Do you understand the difference? It is legitimate to question whether Sea Searcher works until SFRX proves it does by demonstrating so. You have decided Sea Searcher does not work based on having tested similar products, not inventing them. Sorry if I choose to go with the person who has had actual success building something.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SFRX News