InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 45
Posts 7114
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/18/2020

Re: Donotunderstand post# 749500

Saturday, 02/25/2023 3:51:23 PM

Saturday, February 25, 2023 3:51:23 PM

Post# of 797112
Well, that's probably why the courts loved the Chevron Defence, in that landmark case, the USSCT said we will let these "administrative specialists" decide what their statutes mean. This effectively reduced the ability of the citizens and their businesses from challenging the decisions of the 100's of federal agencies here mostly in DC.

Last week, Justice Kagan (a 'yuge' advocate of the Administrative State) in the Section 230 Internet Shield Statute case stated, “These are not, like, the nine greatest experts on the internet,”.

But several cases have emerged over the previous decades where the USSCT stepped in and said basically, "No we are invalidating the federal agency action because that decision is reserved EXCLUSIVELY for the peoples ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES IN CONGRESS."

These early cases subsequently became known as the Major Questions Doctrine (MQD) and last Summer, Justice Gorsuch was kind enough to list its necessary elements in WV v EPA.

The courts move at glacial speeds...