Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[NeoSunTzu]

Don't you think it is a good idea to at least explore legal challenges in the event that the current round of litigation ends up with goose eggs for the beleaguered shareholders?

That question is a complete non sequitur reply. Nobody is against exploring legal challenges and my post stated nothing of the kind. The post advocated for use of and referenced a primary reputable, legal source on the major questions doctrine from a recognized global leader in banking & financial services. If somehow you had the legal expertise, scholarship, or influence with any of the plaintiff's lawyers to bring such a case, write a relevant legal brief, or lead them to some unexplored avenues we'd be having a totally different converstion. If you're confident in what you do or say, and feel it provides value, then more power to you, but if that's the case there was no need to reply to a post that was not aimed at you individually. We're on the same side and both your head and heart are in the right place advocating for shareholder rights, but the relentless unqualified legal speculation that takes offense to advice to others to seek qualified primary sources is the very essence of the "pseudo barrister" remark.