InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 22
Posts 4308
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/16/2013

Re: mr_sano post# 53887

Wednesday, 02/15/2023 6:41:48 PM

Wednesday, February 15, 2023 6:41:48 PM

Post# of 56668
I don’t think so. The very fact KM was interested, and willing to test and to pay the rest of the expenses including engineers, materials, the cost of using the pipeline etc tells me that this is the 2nd major Fortune 500 oil company interested in testing AOT. It tells me they would have been willing to sign a contract to pay handsomely for AOT if the test was satisfactory to them.

To spell it out for you. It means that should any other test actually work, the likelihood of a fully executed sales contract is very high.

The data on the condensate line was good. And that is amazing considering it was on CONDENSATE. Which is basically a diluent, and not a heavy crude oil which AOT works better on. The data was commensurate with the lab test, which we know were good. Yet another data point that tells me AOT works.

“The operative word “if” pretty much nullifies any positive take anyone could possibly glean from disclosed results. Both TCPL and KM failed. It is also false to say that KM paid for “all” expenses to test.”