Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Donotunderstand]

You lost me -- or as often - I simply am lost or do not understand

From your response - comment

"Therefore the NWS was allowable when acting as a conservator under HERA's Incidental Powers provision.

But none of the shareholders have litigated or brought up the issue of whether or not the US Constitution permits a federal agency to decide a Major Question of Economic and Political Importance like nationalizing the 2 lynchpins of the US Secondary Mortgage Markets and its impact on all American Families that consume Housing".

The confusion is ------ I have thought that it is the NWS and every penny taken by GOV that is the nationalizing of .... And you note the court said that is allowable because it is blessed by the nature and wording of the incidental Powers provision in HERA

If not the NWS ---- what is the argument that F and F have been or were "nationalized" that is left to call a Major Decision -- that somehow falls outside the incidental HERA powers?