InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 18
Posts 778
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/10/2018

Re: Robert from yahoo bd post# 748182

Sunday, 02/12/2023 10:26:19 AM

Sunday, February 12, 2023 10:26:19 AM

Post# of 797188
Robert, what's wrong? Did I pp in your cheerios? You were on the NonDelegation Doctrine kick and thought it was the last gasp savior....wanted a case....I gave you one from the Supreme Court.....says you're barking up the wrong tree.

NOW you're on to 'major questions'. Robert, you need to go back to the case I cited. Congress can delegate....'major stuff' if you will....to FHFA...which they did.

You seem to be confused. Conservatorship v Nationalization. You still have your commons...goin to the moon...worth $10, 100, 1000.....I keep hearing that every day. That's not nationalization now is it? No taking has happened, according to the CoFC. No nationalization.

You want a case... COLLINS. Been there and done that. It's not a question of whether or not the major questions doctrine was applicable, it's a question of whether or not an agency has operated OUTSIDE of the statute that created it. In Collins, the SC said it hadn't.

WV v EPA:
Under this body of law, known as the major questions doctrine, given both separation of powers principles and a practical understanding of legislative intent, the agency must point to "clear congressional authorization" for the authority it claims. Utility Air, 573 U.S. at 324, 134 S.Ct. 2427. Pp. 2607-2610.

NWS all legal and within statutory bounds....according to the SC.....major questions doctrine inapplicable.