InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 34
Posts 640
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/09/2013

Re: LuLeVan post# 748127

Saturday, 02/11/2023 1:43:57 PM

Saturday, February 11, 2023 1:43:57 PM

Post# of 793328
The NWS is not an issue. The SPSPA itself is just a symptom of the real violation of statute and Constitution. The questions that no one has yet to ask is. Under what congressional authority did Treasury increase the tax payer debt to provide the $200 billion funding commitment? Treasury says in the SPSPA that it was authorized by section 304 of the amended Charter Act. It was not. Had treasury purchased 200 billion of FNMA debt obligations, MBS, preferred stock or common stock, then they would be correct. They did not! So there remains a statutory violation and 2 constitutional violations, separation of power/major questions doctrine and public debt clause 14th amendment violation. I am doing what I can to move these claims foreword, hopefully you will as well.