InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 12
Posts 3507
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 07/11/2022

Re: HokieHead post# 116996

Thursday, 02/09/2023 10:06:28 AM

Thursday, February 09, 2023 10:06:28 AM

Post# of 172244

GS has seen the issuing docs and evidently feels his attorneys can defend the position that shares were issued improperly or even fraudulently. I personally think he wouldn't have spent a penny on this filing unless he was highly certain he would win, and that is just common sense.



I don't think you can draw these conclusions.

All Sharp had to think was that the defendant wouldn't contest in court. A default judgment wins and the shares are canceled.

He doesn't need proof of anything being issued fraudulently if it is uncontested.

If someone can't tell that a shell is a shell, can you trust anything else that they say?