Good Vibrations Shoes Inc (GVSI)

[Yolo]

You do know that you claiming to have seen an email exchange between two other people, without providing any evidence to prove it, is the very definition of hearsay, right?

Me refuting the 4 hour poo poo session that he “sold his shares” should be viewed as a positive for the shareholders. Hilarious how actual emails to Sharp are considered hearsay but looking at googled Cornell Law websites get the “pat on the back”.

Had you posted a screenshot of the email, nobody would be calling it hearsay because it would no longer be hearsay.

But hey, if it is substantiated in some way, then I'm glad your friend reached out and asked. Until then, however, while I believe you that Sharp said that in an email, I'm not sure it is the unassailable proof you believe it to be.

Using WNFT logic, Sharp needs to show a statement from the transfer agent proving that he still owns shares. But even that might not be sufficient to show ownership for some, it only proves possession. So to prove that he actually owns the shares, I guess Sharp needs to provide evidence that he paid for the shares and that GVSI received consideration from his purchase.