Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Barron4664]

Thank you FOF and Rodney for providing copies of Washington Federal and Kelley. After a brief read through of the claims, it seems that neither addresses the requirements and prohibitions on Treasury and FHFA in the Charter Act. Washington Federal came so close but didnt make the connection. So unless someone can point me to a prior lawsuit that makes my claims of illegal commitment fee, I believe the legal theory is novel. It seems there are no claims based solely on Treasury over-reach and instead all litigate against the imposition of the conservatorship.

I also believe that “The doctrine of continuing claims” applies to the 6 year statute of limitations if any shareholders are considering their own legal actions. This means that even though the initial commitment fee was enacted in 2008 and continues to this day, the 3rd amendment, and 4th amendment effectively create new claims because each act introduces new forms of damage” I’m wondering if I should set damages based on calculating the change in value of my fraction of 20% of total shares times the warrant price of 0.000001 per share and my fraction of 0.1% of total shares after SPS conversion to commons. Plus court costs of course.