InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 46
Posts 7114
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/18/2020

Re: The Man With No Name post# 746156

Thursday, 01/26/2023 7:05:19 PM

Thursday, January 26, 2023 7:05:19 PM

Post# of 793419
Well, why don't you read WV v EPA, it was decided last June by the SCOTUS. While it didn't touch the Chevron Doctrine that gives these federal agencies WIDE latitude, it did discuss the Major Questions Doctrine, which simply states that some important National and Economic decisions are EXCLUSIVELY to be decided by the peoples ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES IN CONGRESS NOT Unelected Bureaucrats like DeMarco.

If you believe like I did that DeMarco in conjunction with ANOTHER federal agency NATIONALIZED THE 2 LYNCHPINS OF THE SECONDARY MORTGAGE MARKET, then we've got a Major Question of Economic and Political Importance.

If you are interested in having the NWS (a federal agency action) invalidated and it is decided after years and years of litigation at the Appellate level of any federal circuit and/or the SCOTUS then it may be a viable solution to our problem if we continue getting goose eggs at the courthouse.

The SCOTUS seems determined lately to reign in these out of control federal agencies and is starting to bring back the Nondelegation Doctrine. Why not give them another chance with another example of federal agency overreach?

If I'm not mistaken the Student loan forgiveness cases in front of the SCOTUS this term will give them another opportunity to use the Major Questions Doctrine.

Read just the 1st few pages of the Gorsuch decision and you'll see what I am talking about.

20-1530 West Virginia v. EPA (06/30/2022) - Supreme Court https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1530_n758.pdf