InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 511
Posts 59625
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 12/21/2009

Re: wlfr01 post# 70219

Tuesday, 01/24/2023 8:57:58 AM

Tuesday, January 24, 2023 8:57:58 AM

Post# of 75770
MFT emphatically denies any involvement with Juno……

A real salvor has research files, which is something that’s foreign to SFRX.

They have never ID a wreck that sank in the Juno area carrying valuable cargo.

SFRX goes about things backwards. They start with a wreck or debris and try to make it fit a narrative.

A real salvor starts with known navigational data on wrecks with valuable cargo and goes where the research takes them.

Juno has been worked since the 1980’s, when the claim was issued. If you had a wreck with valuable cargo something would have been found by now, especially if it had BILLION$.

Bob Marx gave SFRX the coordinates of what targets to explore on Juno. They did. The site’s a dud.

But like Melbourne I’m sure we’ll be discussing Juno phantom treasure for years to come since it only takes a day for the Timmy Toy to pinpoint it.

Rinse, wash, repeat, dilute, and come up empty.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SFRX News