Followers | 45 |
Posts | 7114 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 07/18/2020 |
Friday, December 16, 2022 11:23:43 PM
Judge Schlitz seems to be splitting hairs because the Trump letter (which clearly says he would have fired Mel Watt on Day 1) doesn't satisfy the conditions for a remedy?
Looks like J. Schlitz is reaching here, "...and it would be far too easy for a former President—motivated perhaps by a desire to harm a political rival or force a new administration to implement his preferred policies—to circumvent this
holding with after-the-fact assertions about what he would have done if he had only
known he had the authority."
Either side likely would have appealed the lower court Judge and this may be decided by the appellate process anyway.
VHAI - Vocodia Partners with Leading Political Super PACs to Revolutionize Fundraising Efforts • VHAI • Sep 19, 2024 11:48 AM
Dear Cashmere Group Holding Co. AKA Swifty Global Signs Binding Letter of Intent to be Acquired by Signing Day Sports • DRCR • Sep 19, 2024 10:26 AM
HealthLynked Launches Virtual Urgent Care Through Partnership with Lyric Health. • HLYK • Sep 19, 2024 8:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp. Appoints Kevin Arias as Advisor to the Board of Directors, Strengthening Strategic Leadership • ELMGF • Sep 18, 2024 10:29 AM
Mawson Finland Limited Further Expands the Known Mineralized Zones at Rajapalot: Palokas step-out drills 7 metres @ 9.1 g/t gold & 706 ppm cobalt • MFL • Sep 17, 2024 9:02 AM
PickleJar Announces Integration With OptCulture to Deliver Holistic Fan Experiences at Venue Point of Sale • PKLE • Sep 17, 2024 8:00 AM