Fannie Mae (FNMA)

[Robert from yahoo bd]

Clearly a Constitutional Violation occurred with the inability of the POTUS to have control over Mel Watt and yet no damages?

Judge Schlitz seems to be splitting hairs because the Trump letter (which clearly says he would have fired Mel Watt on Day 1) doesn't satisfy the conditions for a remedy?

Looks like J. Schlitz is reaching here, "...and it would be far too easy for a former President—motivated perhaps by a desire to harm a political rival or force a new administration to implement his preferred policies—to circumvent this
holding with after-the-fact assertions about what he would have done if he had only
known he had the authority."

Either side likely would have appealed the lower court Judge and this may be decided by the appellate process anyway.