InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5219
Posts 24032
Boards Moderated 5
Alias Born 09/20/2000

Re: moneynmetals post# 8534

Wednesday, 02/14/2007 3:12:40 PM

Wednesday, February 14, 2007 3:12:40 PM

Post# of 143047
Moneymetals...

Thanks for your kind words. Believe me, I'm just glad to be posting as an outlet from time to time. I appreciate too much for just being here to ever really get mad at anyone. Long story.

I have always respected the Marines, but since sharing some of the same dangers with some of them, I have learned to appreciate them even more to include the Navy and Army. Don't get me wrong, I'm still glad I joined the Air Force though! LOL

I think as long as CHNW can continue informing shareholders of their progress while actually making progress, we will be fine.

I also think it could be awesome if they were to time announcing a huge reduction in shares to the OS and placed back into the Treasury along with some very positive FOREX news.

Now throw in a name, CUSIP#, and ticker change and I think we might be in for something nice. Now if there really isn't a naked short, then the name, CUSIP#, and ticker change won't have as great of a reaction as we anticipate. It won't matter because it will at least verify and keep some things in check.

I'm kind of in between thoughts on how large is the naked short or if there really is one. If there isn't a naked short it still doesn't matter because I think the inventory of shares is nearing zero which would cause CHNW to trade as if it was a naked short given buying volume. That is why this accumulation is so important for getting the bulk of shares into strong hands. I think something huge is "quietly brewing up" here with CHNW. These are only my opinions.

v/r
Sterling