InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 117
Posts 42234
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 05/16/2011

Re: Carjockey2 post# 89981

Wednesday, 11/16/2022 3:36:46 PM

Wednesday, November 16, 2022 3:36:46 PM

Post# of 96715
Errr UMM... doesn't it depend on the SP when the POS aka ASTA was bought, for the 57% to have meaning? Yea, I think that's the way it works.

For instance, some of the stock I have (real stock, not an OTC scam like ASTA) could be down for the day/week/month but for me I am still 57% (Or more) up....

And then, there is the stock that I bought and it is "up" , say 57%, but for me it is down because I paid a higher price than the SP for the day.

Yep, that's how that works...

So I don't understand the value of stating a stock price, especially a POS pretend company/stock like ASTA (that continues to be in EM status) is anything.... up or down...

However, I am sure flippers understand the "value" of ASTA <snicker>

It's fun to watch a roller coaster like ASTA... it's .003.... yes it is... no it's not... yes it is... no it's not....

Good Times.... <chuckle>

HOWEVER, I will say the one consistent thing about ASTA is the EM status...

Oh yea, something else that is consistent, Tiny Mickey being "transparent". He has not been and will never be - transparent. Where was the PR about his troubles in the lawsuit with Brad?

Don't the contempt of court and Sanctions mean anything? I think so and certainly if he wants to be transparent and protect investors, he would let them know. Right? Oops, guess being transparent isn't fun.

Wonder if he has answered those interrogatories yet? I Believe they were to be answered last December, maybe January. Anyway, MANY MANY MANY Months.... thus leading to Tiny Mickey's Sanctions and contempt of court.

Sorry for my long post, all those nagging thoughts just keep rolling around in my head. wink