InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 26
Posts 5640
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/28/2015

Re: MrNormall post# 57240

Wednesday, 11/09/2022 2:38:16 PM

Wednesday, November 09, 2022 2:38:16 PM

Post# of 69134
Absolutely wrong

First of all GS should had provided a court approved certification of the transfer agents numbers

Second Nevada Court just doesn’t cancel shares

Third Calasse doesn’t have to be part of the custodianship to keep his share.
This is why so many dead shells are left by the wayside because of previous owners shares.

The way this gets resolved if GS is willing is to take Calasse shares as debt like Lazar did with 8 billion invalid shares the court wouldn’t cancel

GS should be looked at by the SEC for pumping a court decision for investors before a decision