Worldwide NFT Inc (WNFT)

[FEARANDGREED]

It would appear that the courts order is addressing a procedural/clerical technicality.
(see court document below)

A person must have been served with process, appeared in the district court, and been named as a party of record.

In essence, it would appear (Key word appear... don't jump my ass) that Calasse does fit some of those requirements per what shows via the Eighth Judicial District Court Portal's record of the previous case (the one Calsse is appealing - see screenshot) ...It will will be interesting to see if this can be presented/corrected properly by Calasse's team.

It would be quite surreal - darkly comedic (peculiar..bizarre??) if Calasse lost this fight on a procedural-methodology based Fu*k-Up after all this time.

.....Looks like we will find out in 30-45ish days.

Bounced this off of my paralegal wife and received speculative thoughts but nothing definitive from her.. Trying to get some feedback from my neighbor (senior law partner) to see what his take is. I will report back when I have word form the maestro himself.

To se the original case, go to:
https://www.clarkcountycourts.us/Portal/
..click on "Smart Search" and then type in Sharp, George.
The "Custodian Ventures, LLC, Plaintiff(s) vs. Goff Corp" case # A-20-815182-B will appear along with a list of others.


The supreme court appeal link is:
https://caseinfo.nvsupremecourt.us/public/caseView.do?csIID=64060&combined=true