Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Louie_Louie]

This is true! When you are dealing with a judicial system that is not only predjudiced, but can also change at a whim what a word means ( like before, meaning after, and vice versa - insanity), and also interpreting 2 or 3 words to mean a hell of a lot more than they do, you are very handicapped, no matter how good a lawyer you are. Now they are contending with a judge deeming what is permissible as evidence and what is not. It's beyond reason. A judge can sit and find excuses not to use any of those concealed documents or witnesses or damage models, when truth be told, they should all see the light of day.

It's no wonder the jury asked for a definition of plain and simple wording meaning. This judge has total disregard and semantic shifts constantly on words to aid one side of the argument. Just like other courts did.

Many of the dismissed cases and losses were due too not being able to get unadulterated interpretations of words and these semantic shifts, words that are understood fairly the same by you and I, but find some totally obscure alternate non-meaning by the judges, aka via bullshit reasoning. So....I think the jurors asking for definitions is great! I think they should ask for more meanings like conservatorship, temporary, rogue (as in decision making), Net Worth, investor, nationalization, just to name a few.