Tuesday, October 25, 2022 2:11:59 PM
I can't make any sense out of this.
1) The Collins case is not takings claims.
2) It has been remanded to see if plaintiffs should get retroactive relief. That's not the same as damages.
3) The jury verdict in Lamberth's case won't be applicable to any other case that currently exist because it is only about the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.
4) Whether or not Pandora's box has been opened does not depend on the outcome of Lamberth's trial.
FEATURED Element79 Gold Corp. Appoints Kevin Arias as Advisor to the Board of Directors, Strengthening Strategic Leadership • Sep 18, 2024 10:29 AM
Mawson Finland Limited Further Expands the Known Mineralized Zones at Rajapalot: Palokas step-out drills 7 metres @ 9.1 g/t gold & 706 ppm cobalt • MFL • Sep 17, 2024 9:02 AM
PickleJar Announces Integration With OptCulture to Deliver Holistic Fan Experiences at Venue Point of Sale • PKLE • Sep 17, 2024 8:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Mt. Vernon Gold Mine Bulk Sample, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Sep 11, 2024 9:15 AM
One World Products Issues Shareholder Update Letter • OWPC • Sep 11, 2024 7:27 AM
Kona Gold Beverage Inc. Reports $1.225 Million in Revenue and $133,000 Net Profit for the Quarter • KGKG • Sep 10, 2024 1:30 PM