Mirage Energy Corp (MRGE)

[Livefree1776]

WW,

I do not disagree about "There is plenty of evidence" premise, this I know but the argument is based the argument of discouraging a civil suit if the fraud premise turns out to be true. Some believe it does not reach the threshold of preponderance of evidence, which is required in a civil suit to be victorious.

I.e. more likely than not, 50.1 vs 49.9, greater than 50% chance that the claim is true. a totally different standard than criminal law requires and a much less of a burden on the plaintiff side to prove. My contention is we are not the judge nor jury, no one knows all the facts-evidence out there...


That is the logic behind the posts bc I do not agree with the premise of discouraging a civil suit if fraud ends up being the case. that is not to say fraud is the case, I do not know but if it turns out to be then people need to do what they think is right. The board is not the litigator of such action, and I will not play along like it is.

Plus, I thought if anyone who has thought/stating fraud for over a year and now saying do nothing about if turns out to be true in the end seems not logically consistent imo.

Side note-Still a waiting game for me for true confirmation either way.

That all being said,
Go Mrge
Go MW

P.S., with just me pushing back on the denial of a civil suit premise, more evidence is forthcoming-imo proving my point even further