Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[M I A]

Well, I don't remember any evidence like we will be seeing in Lamberth trial, pertaining to the sweep and it's true origin and motive. I believe that would have been seen as an overreach and exceeding of their power.

If "death spiral" (future draws) and treasury funding commitment disappearing was presented and not properly refuted by plaintiffs then the SCOTUS went with it.

A justice, I forget which one, asked D's lawyer if FHFA could do ANYTHING and not be subject to judicial review. D 's lawyer said, "well, no not just anything".

So the truth was the FHFA exceeded power and that action should be subject to judicial questioning. That is why we have Lamberth right, isn't it? That is why Ugly Betti lying is a big deal, right?

Care to fill in any blanks for me, but it appears that's why we still have hope at all because it was all lies.

Thanks skeptic

JMO