InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 52
Posts 6693
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/18/2016

Re: FnF_Newbie post# 735393

Thursday, 10/13/2022 7:38:21 PM

Thursday, October 13, 2022 7:38:21 PM

Post# of 793426

Kthomp, are you negative on potential Lamberth damages beyond 2012 decline in share price (including pre-judgement interest)?



At this point I'm afraid so. The two main damages theories that the plaintiffs put forth - expectancy and restitution - both got denied by Lamberth. He also did not let them supplement Mason's report to include reliance damages, which would have been equal to the restitution damages.

I'm not sure what the plaintiffs will be allowed to present, but the testimony of their main damages expert has been gutted.

Got legal theories no plaintiff has tried? File your own lawsuit or shut up.

Posting about other posters is the last refuge of the incompetent.