If you're right, Sir, there's no reason to hand around. Correct? Yet, this page seems to be one of the more active forums on iHub.
There are rational reasons for continuing to investigate what has occurred from Autumn 2017 to the present, taking account of all factors and events. Our planet and its people face an energy crisis. BioAmber developed a technology that mediates that crisis. Shareholders appreciate the value of this. And, as I mentioned, we contributed to public confidence until Eno and the Board placed the company on a path that served "somebody's" interests, which should have included our interests. There is still reason to believe that "the Law" in this case, if not the executive actions, worked to preserve our Shareholder interests. Indeed, as I mentioned in another message, events transpired that interrupted the normal flow of activity that would have provided earlier clarity.
Apparently, some folks disagree with this. Wouldn't you agree, though, that repetitive negativity serves no one's interests?
I'm just sayin'.
