![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Tuesday, September 20, 2022 10:56:59 AM
Whether or not a contract was needed is not at issue. The executive branch chose to create a contract with itself to give itself the Seniors, 98%warrants, 10% dividend, 12%in kind, NWS, and liquidation preference. Since SCOTUS has ruled Congress gave FHFA the ability to create a new definition of Conservatorship that can do what it wants to benefit itself and the public, there was no reason for a contract. This is a simple matter. A contract with only one party is not a contract and is null and void. FHFA according to SCOTUS is free to propose rules in the federal register under APA to effectuate all of the actions that were in the PSPA. Let them go ahead and re-propose rules after the PSPA is voided in its entirety. The current situation is an abomination of basic Contract and property rights. A purely Statists wet dream.
FEATURED BNCM and DELEX Healthcare Group Announce Strategic Merger to Drive Expansion and Growth • Jul 2, 2024 7:19 AM
NUBURU Announces Upcoming TV Interview Featuring CEO Brian Knaley on Fox Business, Bloomberg TV, and Newsmax TV as Sponsored Programming • BURU • Jul 1, 2024 1:57 PM
Mass Megawatts Announces $220,500 Debt Cancellation Agreement to Improve Financing and Sales of a New Product to be Announced on July 11 • MMMW • Jun 28, 2024 7:30 AM
VAYK Exited Caribbean Investments for $320,000 Profit • VAYK • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Flotation Cell Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. and Hemp Emu Announce Strategic Partnership to Enhance CBD Product Manufacturing • BLEG • Jun 27, 2024 8:30 AM