SiNtx Technologies Inc (SINT)

[XFundManager]

Actually they are just more conspiracist beliefs that invariably oppose the mainstream consensus among those people who are qualified to evaluate their accuracy, such as scientists or historians.

Belief in conspiracy theories is generally based not on evidence, but in the faith of the believer.

Example below:

My work has been classified as a matter of National Security by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (see Figure 2).

Conspiracy theories are often dependent on the opinions of discredited and un qualified individuals such has hutchinson who was convicted of fraud and who works as a janitor while disregarding objective analyses of the evidence provided by qualified scientists..

The last stage is convincing the public there not conspiracies but just classified information:

You call them "conspiracies" but the proper label is classified. Legal Affidavit trumps some random website.

Legal Affidavit of a conspiracy theorist testimony is based on opinion and does not trump the fact he is a convicted charlatan, fraud and works as a janitor.

https://skepdic.com/hutchisonhoax.html

Could it be that there is a strategy to distract people away from looking at the basic data? Is all this an exercise to create more FUD and conspiracies to drown out the facts of evidence?