Friday, September 09, 2022 10:26:20 AM
What I hope of course is that JA (I doubt) won't make 622-cv-356-ADA disappear but he will amend/merge the new case to 6:20-cv-00666 in order to serve several points that I don't even need to mention.
It is true that the court, HDC and Intel did not have a full understanding on how the ALICE 2 step dance should be applied in this case. Now with arguments it will become clear and without doubt for Judge Albright to make a final decision plus he is giving both sides their last chance to prove to him one way or the other.
If we win Intel will be dragged across the carpet as the history involved in how they interacted with HDC as seen by a jury trial will treble the damage award.
...or will JA dismiss the case, handle the case himself or re-appoint a new Judge?
Recent HDVY News
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/17/2023 09:13:54 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/05/2023 07:53:39 PM
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM