True enough and spot on as usual here. I do not disagree with your comments. Although there are certain stories/articles that can be confirmed or narrowed down as to their facts or correctness, yet other real world situations that cannot give you the answers that one may seek in any article or source or in reality living each day. Below are some such situations which tell in a small way these things.
There are some stories in some posted links that have a lot of truth them I can give you an example of a story that was written by two separate reporters below.
First Story headline as written:
Early this morning at 1:00 a.m. on Main Street in Springfield there was a terrible car accident involving (3) cars that took the lives of 10 people. Details to follow as the investigation continues.
Second Story headline as written:
At 1:00 a.m. this morning a car accident occurred on Main Street here in Springfield that looks like (3) cars were involved that horrifically took the lives of 100 people.
So what are the known facts we can make out from these two headlines.
• There was a car accident
• The car accident occurred at 1:00 a.m.
• The car accident happened on Main Street
• The car accident happened in Springfield
What don’t we know here from the above two articles
• How many people actually died in the multi-car accident?
• How many injured people in the multi-car accident?
• Did the person writing the Second Story have a typo in their story on the count of dead people, or is that actually correct?
So from the two stories we can make certain of some facts here and the rest we have no clue of the facts of the number of dead or injured people.
Now let’s look at another situation altogether.
You head to the Art Museum in the City and upon walking from painting to painting you come across a woman who was viewing a Monet painting. She says to you, “Isn’t this painting just beautiful?” You look at it and ask her “What is it about this that makes you say that this is a beautiful painting?” She responds, “ Well for one the way the light is shining off of the leaves and the building is exactly how one would see it in person it is exactly what sunlight looks like against those objects don’t you see that?” You look at it again now with her comments in mind and say, “why yes that is beautiful the way it is depicted here and looks real as if you were there seeing it for yourself, I do see what you mean”.
Here’s the odd thing, the next fifty people all give this woman a different response and none of them are the same from each of them. Not everyone believes it is beautiful for one and others don’t like it at all. So what is the point?
The point is that this question and those like it cannot be answered and ever be correct as it is in the opinion of many what they may think about it being just a painting and nothing special or beautiful. Key being as we all read articles and links posted we all have a brain that shows our differences of opinions, none of them are correct and none of them are incorrect.
That is how the world is when opinions are asked from different humans, we all do not think or act alike. Philosophers will say here that this is a question that cannot be answered and ever be correct or incorrect, except for the person themselves.
I leave you with the below of which I will respond in a few days here.
Is the Moon there if you are not looking at it.?
How do you know it's there?
Response in a few days.
