InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 71
Posts 104340
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 08/01/2006

Re: brooklyn13 post# 422761

Sunday, 09/04/2022 6:05:04 PM

Sunday, September 04, 2022 6:05:04 PM

Post# of 501539
brooklyn13, After your simple mistake of saying Russia had no pipeline to Asia. After not simply accepting that small mistake you made, you may not even realize what you have done. He said:

Their strategy appears to be out place, as Russia in defiance of all global sanctions
has only diverted supplies to Asia, much to the annoyance of Europe and US.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=169863567

Then you made that mistake. Then i, not being sure, checked and corrected you. God knows why you didn't just accept my in good faith correction. Now read his again. He did not say Russia diversion of supplies to Asia fully compensated for what they were losing. He just said they had diverted supplies to Asia. He might have meant it, if so he was wrong. Fact is he didn't say it. And you didn't say what you said since when you said ..

It's just not true that Russia is diverting supplies to Asia. Hello, there aren't any pipelines to Asia in which to move gas. ...
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=169863785

Why didn't you then just accept the correction. Damned if i know. Instead, you changed your tack. maybe you didn't even realize it, but you did. You shifted the debate from your mistake and my correction to saying he said

The point was, that whomever claimed that the Russia's business lost to Europe was recompensed by its business in Asia. Which isn't true (yet):
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=169866396

"Russia's business lost to Europe was recompensed by its business in Asia." He didn't say that. He said Russia diverted supplies. You introduced the fully compensated for idea. With that you changed the context of my correction. I simply and charitably then just repeated what you said and what i had said, in saying..

My point was a simple one. That you were wrong when you said Russia had no gas pipeline
to Asia. i wasn't sure, so checked. That's all. No big deal, just that you did get that wrong.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=169866490

See it. No big deal. You made a little mistake. Then, again you

Sorry, but that's a bit of noncontextual nit picking.. The context was that whomever stated, here, that Russia was compensating for its lost business shipping fuel to Europe by shipping fuel to Asia.
P - My point is that they aren't and they're not. Your point is irrelevant to the discussion, at large, Russia is not shipping enough fuel to Asia to make up for lost revenues from Europe..

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=169867102

fell back on the new debate context which you yourself had introduced. And as if that wasn't enough you then accused me of "noncontextual nit picking". Sorry pal, you changed the context by saying he/she said Russia's diversion had fully compensated them. You interpreted his "has only diverted supplies to Asia" as meaning fully.

What he meant would have been a totally different debate. My correction of your "no pipeline" mistake had nothing at all to do with what he said. My correction was simply and correctly about what you had said.

Your saying i was guilty of noncontextual nit picking is your 2nd mistake.

PS: As for your 2nd reply,

"I don't have private messaging privileges (even though your belief is that everyone on this board does) or I would send this message that way.
P - It irks me that you fact checked me about the existence and number of Russian pipelines to Asia (although you were incorrect about a second one), yet did not extend that courtesy to the person who made the insupportable claim about Russian fuel revenues.
P - If you're going to be a fact checker, fact check everyone. Otherwise, even though I'm sure you're not, it comes across that you're playing favorites, some people need to bring the facts, with links or other supporting evidence, and some people don't.
"
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=169867175

where the hell did all of that totally wrongheaded rant come from??? First you attribute a belief to me about pms which i have never held. Then you say i was incorrect about a 2nd one

Careful - Russia in fact has one gas pipeline to China and maybe even a 2nd by now.
where i never was. I didn't know about the 2nd. Why did i say "maybe even a 2nd by now", lol, because the article i gave you said

"Since the end of last year, the new Power of Siberia pipeline has been in operation, transporting gas from Russia’s Chayandinskoye field to China, with another field to be opened by 2022."

"to be opened by 2022." .. https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/replies.aspx?msg=169863785 .

Where is my mistake on the 2nd pipeline? Fact is i didn't make one.

In the face of your wrongheaded rant in that 2nd reply of yours, i'll simply add: Seriously brooklyn13, we all fact check each
other. Not every single time we see something we wonder about, but we do. That's obvious to anyone who reads the board.

All i did was correct a simple mistake of yours and your refusal to accept you made a simple
mistake has ended up taking it to this. For some reason i don't fully understand.

Note: i included dealing with your 2nd reply here because you went off the rails and i didn't want to waste any more time on it than i have here.

It was Plato who said, “He, O men, is the wisest, who like Socrates, knows that his wisdom is in truth worth nothing”

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.