Blum Holdings Inc (BLMH)

[stockanalyze]

if you mean no settlement, it is defendant's choice, it is a slam dunk for people's to prove breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of control, self-dealing, corporate waste, and unjust enrichment , i and others have been saying the same here, it is obvious. they have issued themsellves 10 million, 50 million shares and issued shares to themselves on monthly basis. free shares, fully vested. if am a jury, it is a slam dunk for plaintiff's. would be stupid to drag this and lose in the end and shareholders lose. in this case, imo, they will pierce the corporate veil considering the fraudulent history of this company.