Friday, August 26, 2022 5:58:20 PM
They wouldn't change c-ship part of HERA. It would be a ruling based on how it was implemented, which was illegal. The imposition of c-ship through coercion was and still is against HERA.
So, in fact, they would be upholding HERA as written when they strike at the c-ship. Allowing the c-ship to stand would be a misinterpretation of HERA and that would be changing the law.
The very thing you said they don't do, would be what they are doing by misinterpreting HERA to allow coercion, which it most certainly does not.
But who am I to think the government could make a mistake?
Or admit to it?
Thanks for your responses
VAYK Exited Caribbean Investments for $320,000 Profit • VAYK • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Flotation Cell Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. and Hemp Emu Announce Strategic Partnership to Enhance CBD Product Manufacturing • BLEG • Jun 27, 2024 8:30 AM
POET Wins "Best Optical AI Solution" in 2024 AI Breakthrough Awards Program • POET • Jun 26, 2024 10:09 AM
HealthLynked Promotes Bill Crupi to Chief Operating Officer • HLYK • Jun 26, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Short Term Department of Defense Contract Wins Will Exceed $1,100,000 for the current Quarter • BANT • Jun 25, 2024 10:00 AM