InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 12
Posts 738
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/24/2021

Re: Clark6290 post# 730078

Friday, 08/26/2022 5:58:20 PM

Friday, August 26, 2022 5:58:20 PM

Post# of 796655
You read wrong. The courts wouldn't change law, even though, didn't they kinda change it with "for cause" issue?, but anyway.

They wouldn't change c-ship part of HERA. It would be a ruling based on how it was implemented, which was illegal. The imposition of c-ship through coercion was and still is against HERA.

So, in fact, they would be upholding HERA as written when they strike at the c-ship. Allowing the c-ship to stand would be a misinterpretation of HERA and that would be changing the law.

The very thing you said they don't do, would be what they are doing by misinterpreting HERA to allow coercion, which it most certainly does not.

But who am I to think the government could make a mistake?
Or admit to it?

Thanks for your responses