InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 12
Posts 738
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/24/2021

Re: Golfbum22 post# 730071

Friday, 08/26/2022 5:24:15 PM

Friday, August 26, 2022 5:24:15 PM

Post# of 797180
Wouldn't the clock start when evidence was available? How would you know to challenge a c-ship that you were told was legitimate and enough years pass to clear of statute of limitations and then you could admit the secret crime?

If you are being poisoned, but are unaware until signs of serious harm and a diagnosis don't occur for 7- 10 years later when symptoms show up, wouldn't that be when you bring a case and the clock starts?

Like talc powder lawsuits? Harm was being done, but not realized until years later. Why that, but not this?

There are countless more examples of similar instances.

Also it's been the same amount of years to challenge takings at the c-ship beginning as it is the c-ship beginning. Make this make sense. Any help from anyone else reading appreciated.

Thanks

JMO