DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[mingwan0]

Cowboyd, good points. As I said in the original mail we cannot see the context and therefore do not know why Tony was invited to contribute to this. Given the mention of DNAP along with the agencies in question it is indeed tempting to infer an association or familiarity. If this is not the case why are they involved? It could be that somebody suggested that two people from the Biometrics Council would have some insight. If so who made the suggestion, and why were these two chosen? It is intriguing and I think that we are not yet seeing the whole picture here IMO.