I guess anybody looking here is going to have to decide between two narrative. "I Won't speak for anybody else but I see" a "narrative" that sees problems everywhere, an "opinion" there is some abnormal share selling, even though the stock and activity is really no different then most OTC which is still seriously trying to find the bottom. Unfounded accusations That secret or restricted shares are being flooded into the market even though no proof is given. A narrative that tries to malign officers with proven false accusation about their job history. And continues to repeat it after proven false A narrative of continuing to try and link old claims and connections that have been long ago been severed(because management acknowledged they were not a good fit)
OR a narrative that, while acknowleding any OTC is risky and played with money one can afford, looks for those gems that are truly undervalued by ACCEPTED finzncial valuation methods. No company is perfect and at the OTC level mistakes and delays are to be expected but the facts for any new investors that are hard to ignore, are plentiful and provable.
ANY, ANY company on any exchange can fix the books, exaggerate or hide serious issues, some level of benefit of doubt is required. But here you have
A company with 6-7 years of solid growth history (if they were not going to make it. Most don't in first 5 years)
A company with provable businesses, locations that can be seen, acquisitions of profitable companies with even LONGER histories
A company That is keenly aware of and Exceptional at keeping information flowing to its investors. A rarity in most OTC stocks.
A company with constant year over year growth Adapting and moving into new areas of the industries They are pursuing.
A company with not only Excellent, growing revenues but a very solid profit margin, Again a rarity in the OTC.
A company with no toxic debts and assets that exceed liabilities.... Again a rarity in the otc
So in the humble of opinion of myself and most that post here.... These are the choices One has to consider when deciding On giving this company a chance.
I have been known to give criticism of the company for directions I think should be different... At the same time I speak out against exaggerated overvaluation of stock prices only to draw in new Investors. I also try not to give FUD That is not truly warranted Nor continue propagating Issues over a period of weeks months or even years. These are the 2 attitudes and narratives Potential new investors can choose between. I guess only history will tell.
