InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 53
Posts 6737
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/18/2016

Re: Guido2 post# 728095

Tuesday, 08/02/2022 12:41:21 AM

Tuesday, August 02, 2022 12:41:21 AM

Post# of 796797
This deserves its own post. In regard to the warrants you claimed:

The amount of crookedness =
($95 billion x 79.9%) - $72,600.



Where does $95B come from? Fannie's Q2 2008 10-Q form says its net worth as of June 30 2008 was $41.226B (page 96 of the pdf), and Freddie's Q2 2008 10-Q form says $12.948B (page 124 of the pdf).

Page 41 of Washington Federal's complaint shows that Fannie had $41.390B of net worth as of June 30 2008, and Freddie had $13.079B. These are close enough, I suppose.

When you subtract out Fannie's $21.725B and Freddie's $14.109B of junior preferred shares, Treasury's Fannie warrants had an equity value of ($41.226B - $21.725B) * 79.9% - $42,781 = $15.581B, and its Freddie warrants' equity value was zero because Freddie's net worth was less than the face value of the juniors.

That means, even according to your own logic, Treasury's Freddie warrants were worthless the moment they were issued! Giving Treasury something with zero value can hardly be called "crooked" or "swindle" or "fraud"!

Got legal theories no plaintiff has tried? File your own lawsuit or shut up.

Posting about other posters is the last refuge of the incompetent.