InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 29
Posts 1907
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/04/2017

Re: chaostrader post# 88542

Monday, 08/01/2022 9:32:13 AM

Monday, August 01, 2022 9:32:13 AM

Post# of 92684
So let me get this straight. Some think because anybody started in a lower position or education early in their career or life, that means there's no way that they can advance or do greater things? Someone wanna give me an example of someone in there twenty's or thirty's just out of school that was immediately given the role of president or CEO in a fortune 500 company. You might want to do a little research of how many top Cios started out in the mail room or equivalent of the companies they're now running. This argument about background is a red herring, And the "argument itself" Is about as desperate a measure, to provide FUD, As I think anyone can come up with.

Why is it so hard for for anyone to post an OTC pink company that has as as good or better stats as this company. I don't care if you think they're a complete lie or not, Surely there is one company that somebody here can post that has As good revenues with as high a profit margin, The years of experience, the number of conglomerates, Assets over liabilities, No toxic debt.

Come on, simple challenge. Some think this is a waste of investment dollars then give us something better with a brighter future. If no one cant come up with that and can only come up with arguments about personal OLD history.... Just not very convincing when you see the hundreds and thousands out there that have no revenue and toxic debt and continue to dilute time after time.

So I would suggest those that like counting on fake catalyst hype runs that usually crash back down, stay investing in those types of companies and the rest of us will hold on to something That none can seem to find a better option too.