InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 12
Posts 738
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/24/2021

Re: kthomp19 post# 728000

Sunday, 07/31/2022 9:37:55 PM

Sunday, July 31, 2022 9:37:55 PM

Post# of 797170
I hear you on your points. I'm saying in this case I believe it to be different. It is unlike any previous ruling of fair value that I'm aware of. Unless the same situation has occurred and no one has mentioned it.

$41 Billion price you mention makes the most sense only if what I'm speaking of is overlooked. It would then be the best indicator.

I don't believe, again my opinion, that the outcome, if it comes to a warrant exercise and taking claim, is based off of these prices. They are not the true value of the companies. Where the gov and new investors plan to cash in $300B + from companies not worth $1Billion Market Cap combined. Not seeing this to come true.
These numbers are manipulated.

Unless you are telling me it is totally legal for some politician to say negative comments about the companies, get the price to drop, which has happened before, and then say "okay we'll cash in warrants at 0.20 cents /pps." Then they drop to 10 cents. And the gov just owes 10 cents pps drop? If that's what you are saying. I understand you, but don't believe it will work that way when it all ends. Again, if they even use the warrants. My opinion and speculation of course.

Thanks for reading.

JMOs