InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 62
Posts 2098
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/09/2020

Re: None

Friday, 07/29/2022 5:46:11 PM

Friday, July 29, 2022 5:46:11 PM

Post# of 157
Ran across the latest filing in the LIFEMD, INC et al v. LAMARCO et al case. Seems that Lamarco's lawyers got a smackdown on their "Motion to Reconsider its Motion to Dismiss" - the court responded with a "DENIED" in capital letters.

https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/41996546/LIFEMD,_INC_et_al_v_LAMARCO_et_al
One statement that stood out of the filing was:

A motion for reconsideration addresses only factual and legal maters that the Court may have overlooked.... It is improper on a motion for reconsideration to ask the Court to rethink what [it] had already thought through - rightly or wrongly.



Judges typically don't appreciate being told what to do, how to do it, and especially questioned on what they've already ruled on.

".....bailiff, whack his pee-pee"

I follow Viking Wealth...shouldn't you ???

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LFMD News