InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 12
Posts 738
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/24/2021

Re: Robert from yahoo bd post# 727772

Wednesday, 07/27/2022 9:57:15 PM

Wednesday, July 27, 2022 9:57:15 PM

Post# of 799656
Artificially suppressed prices based on lies should not be used by any reasonable person to come up with a fair value estimation for a takings. Plus, I don't fully believe it should be possible to not only use an artificial number that is influenced easily. Especially on an OTC exchange, but go back in time and choose any low number that makes it costs them the least to pay off.

What about this nonsense of going back in time and picking some really low number and waiting until courts force them into it and Fannie and Freddie are effin huge and then saying, "well, oh alright, we took them okay. When they were worth $1Billion MarketCap for both companies and NOW they are worth $360Billion." "Oh well, you can't punish us for the money WE made since taking, ONLY for the money WE took when we decide when we took it. And according to OUR calculations and "accountants" we only owe you $2Billion." "Cool. Next."

Supreme C then answers with "glad this worked out for all parties." and then thanks the govt for all their cooperation.


What a stretch.

If they take it now, then it should be what they are Fairly worth now. Not what it prints.
Just like JP should not be paid what they are printing. Bunch of rubbish. Full par and full value if you take it. And they have not done a secondary offering and have not used the warrants. So Common holders, 1.8Billion shares (est), own 100%. And JP are entitled to full par about $34B (est) plus any damages. That's right folks. You take it now, you pay what it's worth now. Not what OTC prints. What a joke.


Just a thought. MO