InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 31
Posts 7696
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/24/2007

Re: None

Thursday, 07/21/2022 10:57:27 PM

Thursday, July 21, 2022 10:57:27 PM

Post# of 57170
“We have seen before; the absence of a successful testing program can lead to an unintended failure. The follow up hydrostatic test is designed to run a fully assembled AOT at near operational conditions. Since we are not installed on a
pipeline, we will lack flow and pressure, but all other factors will be the same as a customer installation. “

Nearly operational but lacks flow and pressure and operates at a viscosity of 1cp! They say this with a straight face!!!Qsep admin must think it’s investors are so gullible that they still
cannot discern when they are getting yanked! Any cursory examination of this pseudo tech will simply show that its ineffective and any viscosity reducing effect is caused by the imparting of heat through resistive heating(aka joule heating) The whole clumping theory floated by the college professor who never brought a single commercial product to market after decades of trying is just a wild extrapolation by this so-called inventor of the tech who btw has not been active with company for years! Qsep is arrears for licensing fees to the tune of over 1M collecting 10% a year interest but they still paid in hundreds of thousands of dollars to Temple. What exactly did Qsep get for the many years of paying 187k a year just in patent maintenance fees? Of this125k is for the fuel injection patent!!!Nothing this company does makes sense!
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent QSEP News