Hey Bio - Allow me to reiterate a couple of points to ensure we are all focused on the right things.
Notes:
1. This new Bill is not going to pass, if you have been watching even the dems know it contains wording that is NOT acceptable to even them. If by some wild chance with some pretty abstract deal making it does pass congress during lame duck, it will not pass the Senant period (all have already stated do a rewrite). Thus it is NOT the Bill itself that is driving current flux.
2. Remember what we spoke about with regards to silent (no info coming out). This company has done so for many reasons, but top reason is to add necessary pieces
a. Companies (to reduce conflict of interests),
b. Process flows that align with potential upcoming regulatory changes,
c. Alignment of both the top two to DEA and FDA, thus an auto correction and compliance to Banking act(s).
3. All of you who have worked at higher levels understand the need for secrecy, until there is no need of it - I build a system and validate its parts and pieces, then I test it. THEN and ONLY then I want to ensure everyone else follows suit (with the map you built).
4. We also know that when working in a new space coverage is key, that means you throw out more than one bean to watch it grow. When you throw the beans out you place each in different environments to ensure best end state. I will ask you to go out and research the B2B companies that Hypur Ventures (I and II) has cultivated, and have a large amount of shares in. Regardless what you find this should start to show you that "they" have not just thrown one bean, and the difference between them is yes.....BLPG and who and HOW it can be managed regardless of what platform it resides under.
5. Didn't you find it interesting that the articles BLPG is under have been written the way they were and what they lay out?
6. Yes, main stake holders/CEO's of the different B2B companies may fight for their rights, even in covert ways as we all know and most of understand. The best we can do as humans is to place personnel at the right intersections to ensure what MAY BE -----BECOMES. That means we build hierarchies that can be altered quickly to get that leading edge. Have you ever heard of Vardaman? Hypur Ventures hired him in 2016 from the Justice Department, where he spent more than a decade. In 2014, Vardaman helped write guidance for federal prosecutors that sought to curtail cannabis-related MONEY LAUDRING cases against financial institutions in states where weed is legal. What's more interesting is he was replaced by skinner, and he ended up in DC as an attorney adviser. Keep in mind who he and his late father were apart of, I suspect we will see them (him) emerge again !?
7. As we break down every relationship, the positions they held (are holding in some cases) and what direction each has gone we find a very pretty picture. A picture that shows a map of compliance defined in a number of ways and across a number of platforms. WE KNOW EXACTLY WHAT IS, then we create/advise a path to WHAT WILL BE.
8. Hypur Ventures took control of companies FOR A REASON. Regardless the common investor may not dig as deeply as some, THEY know what the end state was to be.
9. Again I will refer to statement 5 above....isn't it curious...has any of the articles been proposed yet....by mishap (5 Million preferred shares sent out and then retracted), perhaps by proxy? Absolutely tattletale signs of direction and from where. Who controls Simplifya (B2B), who controls Hypur (the company)(B2B), who controls BLPG who is actually calling the shots ?!?!
10. To put on a good show all the possible pieces must be in play, at least to the extent they can be ENTANGLED when needed.....did I just mention #5 above again ?!?
Remember cradle to grave compliance and a way to implement the right pieces at the right time not just for DEA and FDA, but for ............................Hint Hint.
I will say this, and it is a way to know more - I am offering it as a gift to you - When I was a Military guy I could look at changes to regulation to understand possible upcoming scenarios. Regulations that were at that point a derivative to a bigger picture - travel guidance. Travel guidance was absolutely necessary, yet who looked at that and leveraged it against tax rules (this person under these conditions will have a reduced tax rate of......). I would invite you to start looking at STATE rules being pushed and by WHOM. I suspect you will find something that will make you very excited. Understand state policy migrates esp. when you have the RIGHT pushers (pushers - lol).
When doing your research we know that compliance must define process flows not only of money but of product itself - look at DEA budget and look closely. When doing your research we need to observe what the FDA actually does, and HOW (KEY)! Remember the quantity/quality etc. of a new item being processed into a new market for human consumption is nearly always done and processed by certain companies(KEY). That means distribution is only left (long story short). Have you looked to see who is aligned...can you find a hint when looking at MTEC?!?
One last time, look at #5 above, and what I just stated.
BLPG is a trigger piece, regardless who thinks who own what. Chris Galvin and his 4 buddies control certain pieces, have you figured out who owns the other pieces?
Lawsuit was settled, or should we say satisfied. I think SATISFIED is a better word. ONE TEAM (YAK TEAM) - Hypur Ventures with three areas competing against each other to become the lead of more than what is clearly stated anywhere unless you dig very deeply.
Federal Policy is great (lol), but policy at state level is ALREADY going forward and has given us not only answers to questions we needed, but who and HOW they are controlled. WHO - remember that, and their relationships as you do your research - how many are aligned with banking itself(crazy).
When I say go BLPG, Go Hypur and GO OTHER, "Hypur is Hypur Ventures (personnel etc., NOT just company itself), "OTHER" is the above frames of reference(s).
I suspect now that internal Hierarchy fighting has taken a break (now its going to be about internal positioning - lol), that we will start seeing movement.
When you look at BLPG we all just need to look at the articles and understand that you cannot create a conflict of interest - alignment within an organization across multiple companies that have opposing (conflicting) interests that would offset compliance.
To say BLPG is a gold mine is a pretty big understatement. My partners and I sometimes laugh trying to figure out if the additional armored cars have already been ordered and standing by.....Hint....who controls BLPG, what resources are being put in place across this industry so when go day comes, they are ready to roll out? Have you ever tried to research how many armored cars are made, and to where they go?
Anyway, forgive my absents, hopefully the above shows you clearly my position, and what I think others needs to be......I see this as the start of buying airspace back in the early cell phone days...nearly same layout (pulled policy, not pushed)?
Still some bumps to go, hopefully they can keep the stock down for a bit longer so Moneybags can get his million shares-lol
Go BLPG, Go Hypur, GO OTHER!!!!
