InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 123
Posts 7664
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/28/2010

Re: A deleted message

Monday, 07/18/2022 10:26:49 AM

Monday, July 18, 2022 10:26:49 AM

Post# of 69183
As self satisfied as it may sound (perhaps just silly and idealistic).

Some actually know (and desire) to trade with a little honor and some don't.

That being said....

the rug pull Sharp pulled


Not entirely:

Perhaps Im lucky because my wife is in the legal profession, but anyone wanting (with even a small desire) to see the true nature of the Calasse case...well, all they had to do was spend a little, search a little and they would have known what was coming -

However, George did an absolute disservice to his shareholders with this twitter post though.




Avery recent post of mine (a theme that I had resonated often)
Wednesday, July 06, 2022
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=169329574

As long as Calasse is exercising his grievances through the court system legally (erroneous as they may be), tortious interference does not apply .... period.

In other words, just as you or I, Calasse has a right to exhaust all of the legal channels available to him.... Im not saying i like it any more than you do.

That being said, AFTER he exhausts the court system (which is his right), if he then goes out of his way to cause harm to Sharp's dealings/process (which could involve a million different methodologies) THEN tortuous interference applies.

....Going through the court system does not qualify as he has the legal right to do so (like it or not).

Quote: Nothing to do with WNFT now




.... Yes, actually it does have something to do with WNFT, why do you thing Mr sharp keeps bringing up "tortuous interference" on his twitter feed if Calasse's actions weren't having a negative impact here. I would say it is out of frustration. Unfortunately (at least in this case), you cant sue someone for engaging the due process legally afforded them.

...And yes, Ive swung this six ways from Sunday-$$$ but Im still holding a "core stack" (just in case you want to accuse me of exercising the "FEAR" part of my handle as you have done before). I'm just not into B.S. these days... as in

Quote: WNFT is not a shell. https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=169321074




...Yeah it is in fact still a shell - until it is not. When the deal/RM is signed/done/ink dry, then it wont be.

...This will be happening shortly in my opinion... as soon as the "Calasse issue" is resolved which Im hoping is any day now.

As Ive stated before, with Calasse in the mix, George can/could/did proceed with FINRA/split/name change no problem.... But getting the actual RM done, (transfer of power etc...etc...) that is going to be tricky while this is going through the court system in my opinion.

I hope I am wrong, as would toughly enjoy making more money here.

In closing, I would say its a safe bet that Nevada SC shoots this down (sooner than later...much sooner Im hoping)

This guy walks up to me at the horse track... As I placed my bet he scoffed at my pick. ....Then offered to by my ticket for half price..