InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 123
Posts 7664
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/28/2010

Re: Tyrus603 post# 45587

Wednesday, 06/01/2022 2:38:57 PM

Wednesday, June 01, 2022 2:38:57 PM

Post# of 69178
I did not discus that with them (referencing your comment below) as I did not notice the GOFF/Sharp difference.

Did your antiquated attorneys explain why the case isn't "Calasse vs GOFF" instead of "Calasse vs Sharp?"



Whether it be "Calasse vs GOFF" -OR- "Calasse vs Sharp"... To the best of my knowledge, you cant hardly start an new case (and/or appeal) at a supreme court level without that same case being heard elsewhere first in a lower court.

In other words, if what you are suggesting is that this is an entirely different issue ("Calasse vs GOFF" instead of "Calasse vs Sharp"), it is not. If it was considered a completely different issue non related to GOFF then it would have initiated in/on/at a lower judicial court level....Not a supreme court level.



This post the "Fear" part of your call sign?


My Response:
I post factually documented information...period. If it helps me in fulfilling my desires in ANY capacity so be it.

...Which now that you mention it Tyrus, I respect your time and your efforts and I hope that your WAX theory is correct ... BUT... when ever I see or hear someone repeat themselves multiple times, over and over in an (even slightly) fearful/defensive fashion, I have to ask them.....

Are you trying to convince me or yourself?

My portfolio on a heading for Mach 10.



Where GOFF is concerned, My "portfolio" already has.
I am a solid trader.... I am in this to make money and I am forthright while doing it.

I am long on GOFF, and I have cash to buy at the right PPS.
I will continue to play it as such.

I will discuss your comments and concerns with the legal council aforementioned in my earlier post.

This guy walks up to me at the horse track... As I placed my bet he scoffed at my pick. ....Then offered to by my ticket for half price..