""""PP, Tobin Smith & you were perfect pumpers."""""
Since your post calling me a pumper has been up for over 4 hours now I guess its ok to reply in kind.
Maybe you should be asking Streetstylz what his point was instead of asking me, since it was he that was so quick to post false and misleading information, in a haste to attempt to prove something I said as false.
Unlike you I didnt pump NEOM on yahoo boards or anywhere else, like you have been doing here for at least what 2 years now? Day in and day out as well.
And you have the gall to call someone else a pumper?
And unlike you after I mentioned NEOM on Yahoo, I have since woke up to their lack of management. Did they have a good technology, of course they did. Thats not the problem. The problem is what they did(better yet, what they didn't do) with that technology.
As I stated here and on Yahoo, I expected them to have their technology up and running in 2004, and showing results in 2005. When the end of 2005 came around and there was no revenues then my opinion changed, just as any shareholders should change. Its a little bit late now when so many are aggressively developing the same technology using other codes and other processes isn't it?
And no my point wasnt to bypass NEOMs patents. If they had gotten the product off the ground in 2004 and early 2005, bypassing their patents would not of been a big issue, because the first one out there usually wins. Now not only are their patents being bypassed, but they surely aren't the first one out their with a working product, and therefore are losing the market share I once thought they would control by being first.
How many years do you think the average investor is supposed to sit around waiting for something to happen? Especially when the management, the investor put their trust in, has proven over and over they aren't capable of getting the job done? For me its been over three years and more then long enough for the self proclaimed LEADERs to get the job done.
You seem to think that an investor is supposed to remain loyal to an investment, and wait indefinately for the company to get their act together to make that investment pay off. I hate to tell you but most analysts disagree with your assessment, and re-evaluate their stock choices regularly, to weed out the non performers. And NEOM if they were in any type of fund portfolio would of been weeded out a long time ago.
I lost my belief in 2005 when the 3rd quarter numbers were released, and that big second launch of 2004 still wasn't producing a dime of revenue. And from there it just kept getting worse when they couldn't get 1 product off the ground, but financed the investors into oblivion to go on a buying spree. When I believed in the company they didn't have nearly 1.5 billion shares of stock spoken for in warrants, preferred, options and outstanding shares.
Then on my views of the technology. I still believe in the technology and think it will revolutionize how we conduct our daily lives. What I no longer believe is that NEOM will be the company taking it mainstream. Too many companies have already passed them by in development of similar applications.
And that comes down to what the real difference is between you and others posting here, and me. I can realize when I made a bad investment, and as I stated here have accepted my losses, so have no agenda to say what I now feel about the company. You and others however, do have an agenda, to protect your investment, and aren't willing to accept the facts because that would effect your investment, so you continue to pump the company, on about every blog site or web site out there that even mentions this technology. And you talk about me being a pumper? Did you ever see me going to multiple websites to pump this stock like you have done.....LOL
P.S. Someone better tell BEAM if she wants her patent approved in China then she better go to a CHINESE patent attorney and not a Hong Kong patent attorney........LOL And also let her know that her information that NEOM filed for a patent is not stated on that site as she claims. All it says is that is a list of Select Clients. Just some more misinformation on her part. It would be interesting to see a HONG KONG patent application list for NEOM though, even though no one here has posted one, yet all make assumptions that this means NEOM is patented in CHINA through a Hong Kong pattent attorney.....LOL
AI
