InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 512
Posts 59981
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 12/21/2009

Re: trueblue post# 68148

Monday, 05/23/2022 6:16:47 AM

Monday, May 23, 2022 6:16:47 AM

Post# of 76552
I wasn’t talking about the Timmy Toy being junk.......

though it may very well be.

I’m talking about the research that led them to Melbourne. It’s junk, much like the estimated value of the cargo. Here’s what I said, in part.

Good research would not only include known navigational data, but also the estimated value of the cargo. It’s not provided in Bureau reports, so go figure.

Juno is a known wreck site, but the big ole ballast pile was a dry hole. Only an idiot would think the treasure was miles away.


Are SFRX shareholders not familiar with the term known navigational data?

Known Navigational Data. Our research must provide information that would allow us to establish a geographically definable search and sinking location and, subsequently, an economically feasible search area for any potential target.

When you and your partners have spent over 2 decades in the same small area and this is what you conclude, the only question is why are you still there? And there’s nothing in the conclusion that says the Timmy Toy has located anything. Read it for yourself.

Raider was right. Floatsom


Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SFRX News