Wednesday, May 18, 2022 1:11:24 PM
This complaint, I think, charges the two aforementioned MM’ers with violation of Section 4, of the Sherman Act. The number of Plaintiffs that can be added to this complaint may, or may not, be beneficial to a positive outcome for Xall’s investors. If interested, that’s something for each of you to consider. Following is a list of complaints, that either CDEL or ETRF have singularly or collectively engaged in:
* CDEL and ETRF, have maintained a wide inside spread on Xall
for nearly 3 years, increasing SH’ers and other investors transaction
cost.
* price competition amongst other Market Makers have been restricted
as CDEL and ETRF have forced compliance with their spreads.
* Shareholders and investors trading Xalles have been deprived of a free
and open competition, via CDEL’s and ETRF’s manipulation.
* the inside spread on Xalles, manipulated by CDEL and ETRF, have
been wider than it should in a competitive market, thus creating higher c
cost for shareholders and investors.
* Xalles Holdings (Xalls) is a profitable company listed on OTC-Pink,
that has performed better than other stocks with less restrictive
inside spreads.
VAYK Discloses Strategic Conversation on Potential Acquisition of $4 Million Home Service Business • VAYK • May 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Awarded $4.19 Million Dollar U.S. Department of Defense Contract • BANT • May 8, 2024 10:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Successfully Closes Maverick Springs Option Agreement • ELEM • May 8, 2024 9:05 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Achieves April Revenues Exceeding $586,000 • KGKG • May 8, 2024 8:30 AM
Epazz plans to spin off Galaxy Batteries Inc. • EPAZ • May 8, 2024 7:05 AM
Moon Equity Holdings, Corp. Announces Acquisition of Wikolo, Inc. • MONI • May 7, 2024 9:48 AM