InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 55
Posts 6775
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/18/2016

Re: Louie_Louie post# 720197

Monday, 05/09/2022 7:12:14 PM

Monday, May 09, 2022 7:12:14 PM

Post# of 801319

This was all put in place to guarantee government wins IF LUQUIDATED. Bankruptcy. The seniors and warrants were meant to destroy the rest of us holders in the event of a bankruptcy.



Partial credit here. The seniors were put in place to make sure private equity holders (junior pref and common) get completely wiped out before Treasury has to take any haircut, and the warrants were designed to "enhance taxpayer value". There is nothing in any of the agreements (SPSPAs, senior pref stock certificates, warrants) that ties any of Treasury's equity stake to whether or not they have been "repaid".

From what FHFA and Treasury say, FnF really would have gone bankrupt in 2008 if Treasury didn't step in and bail them out. It doesn't matter if you disagree because you don't have your own court case going. Washington Federal and Kelly do allege this, but they only want money damages (not senior pref or warrant cancellation), and their cases have been dismissed anyway.



It sounds like you're still making the garbage argument of "liquidation preference only matters in an actual liquidation". That is completely wrong. There are many reasons why liquidation preference matters even outside of an actual liquidation, but here is one that mathematically proves it.

On November 1 2005, well before there was any financial crisis/conservatorship scare, we saw the following closing prices on these Freddie series with $50 liquidation preference:

FMCCN, $41.28, 4.59% dividend rate
FMCKK, $41.60, 5.00% dividend rate
FMCCK, $47.95, 5.79% dividend rate
FMCCP, $48.00, 6.00% dividend rate

The dividend rate certainly affected the prices, but there was clearly something else the market placed value on; otherwise the FMCCN/FMCKK and FMCCK/FMCCP gaps would have been much larger.

The only things that give the juniors value are its liquidation preference amount, dividend rate, and placement in the capital structure of both of those. If liquidation preference truly didn't matter outside of liquidation, FMCCP should have traded 20% above FMCKK, not 15.4%, for example, and there would have been a huge arbitrage opportunity.

Got legal theories no plaintiff has tried? File your own lawsuit or shut up.