InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 69
Posts 7941
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/29/2015

Re: None

Monday, 05/09/2022 11:17:38 AM

Monday, May 09, 2022 11:17:38 AM

Post# of 27667
Understand where you stand in the pecking order.

The higher the level of sensitivity - the more accurate the measurement for whatever molecules are being targeted.

Cannabix - "...and various VOCs in urine, breath, and other matrixes [50]. The ion mobility spectrometry technique has a reported detection limit of 12.5, 25, and 65 parts per billion (ppb) for methamphetamine, amphetamine, and ?9-THC, respectively"

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/a-Breath-collection-unit-for-cannabis-testing-by-Cannabix-Technologies-Inc-reproduced_fig1_337965190

Vox - "This groundbreaking detection technology will be a highly compactable and portable device that can detect and measure VOCs (Volatile Organic Compounds) in part per trillion."

https://voxbiomedical.com/vox-biomedical-featured-as-top-law-enforcement-solution-providers-in-2021

Hound - "Identifying recent marijuana use in breath requires measuring parts per trillion, which would be like finding 1 person in the population of 142 earths combined"

https://houndlabs.com/product-overview/

Unlike HL and Vox, you can't even find Cannabix's level of sensitivity (parts per billion) actually on their website. If it is there it's like finding a needle in a hay stack. They probably rather you not know. Kinda like Cannabix's top advisor Dr. Marilyn Huestis trying to rip on Hound Labs about their devices level of sensitivity. Huestis was thoroughly debunked by the clinical trial data peer-reviewed and published for all to see.

Until the next pump...

Peace

M$
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent BLOZF News