tad shy of half the amount of time for a $0.0005 print. Walllace accomplished this in 30 days after entering AHFD picture. 57 days for Bonilla. not one to nit-pick others posts in any forum, but as one of less than 100 shareholders of AHFD, long haul, seen it all over the years, to a point that every day I'm muttering "what a joke", laughing to the point it hurts, ouch... someone posted what appeared to be a text conversation with Joe Wallace in another forum. Besides the obvious that this may be a deep fake, the author does ask many of the same questions we all would like to know, however it is done in such a way that is sooo thick. Recognition for prior achievements and resulting value from Wallace. Help me out here, where has this been documented, written about, posted by anyone, other than Wallace himself. Fluff. "address that immediately" "absolutely". given this is a legitimate text message interaction should have all us shareholders feeling much more optimistic and not so concerned now that there is actual substantive communication coming from Wallace. Huh??? May I suggest if you ARE a shareholder AHFD common, LONG, cut the b.s. niceties, cordialities. Step up the level of noise associated with the very reasonable questions and concerns yet to be responded to associated with transparency we are all ENTITLED to as public traded company shareholders as the cold hard reality of AHFD today is substantially not much different than that of a month ago, six months ago, years ago. Yes there has been many events through the years that give us all HOPE that there is a future. Questions, concerns unanswered, years of fluff and silence. Wallace, Bonilla, and Manos as no 100K pay off yet that is of public knowledge and until more is known publicly, IMHO, check which should not be processed and as such this shareholder has come to the conclusion that the 3.9B shares issued with zero disclosure about early 2016 while Robert Kropf was CEO, at the market value at the time of appx. 390K was for services rendered by himself for three 12/14/15 SEC submissions. one being form 15 as to not be required to disclose such excessive compensation and if you all remember are those shares that were reflected in the change on OTC of outstanding numbers reported restricted and unrestricted that saw about the exact same number change reported from unrestricted to restricted. So much do I want to be proven incorrect and to stop feeling like I'm one of the couple of shareholders out there attempting to kick in the door and that I cease to mutter "what a joke" as this is how I can't help but feel that nothing has changed since the additions of a couple more CEO's that this shareholder really would rather NOT continue to have to type out in another post....
