InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 516
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/27/2012

Re: rustydog62 post# 9279

Sunday, 05/01/2022 12:14:36 PM

Sunday, May 01, 2022 12:14:36 PM

Post# of 9558
rustydog, the interview was and all his interviews have always been way, way too much about Bob Proulx.

"Under the proficient leadership", 7 years and over a billion OS, yes he has been proficient at dilution and making a nice nest egg for himself.

"Early on, we established a scientific collaboration with the Department of Imaging Physics at MD Anderson". I posted a few weeks ago a question on this specific collaboration and yet no one seems to know what happened to this.

Is the collaboration complete? Where is the instrument that was at MD Anderson?

What were the results?, Why, if it has ended would such a world leading cancer institute give up on the study and the equipment?

These are very important questions and as far as I can see, never answered by Proulx.

I still have no qualms about whether or not the tech works, but why the mystery surrounding MDA?

Look, I am not knocking Proulx or his abilities, I just want more transparency. The pattern is very reminiscent of PR's put out by Maslow & Co. Lots of fluff and no substance or follow up.

I just want a very simple update.

Past, present and future prospects, work, more dilution needed?, forward looking dates, how many instruments presently, planned for, etc. The truth is sometimes painful but it will be very much appreciated by IBX shareholders. No reason to hide the blemishes as well as highlighting the positives.