Now, after working in this industry for many years I will clear up the process of how the TA and compliance works to shed light of the on how narrative what your saying could not be true.
If what you saying is true then any TA would first require a Rule 144 Legal opinion to be written. That would cost around $1000 dollars so that a practicing SEC Attorney could research all the SEC laws and prove those securities were legally obtained, and legally purchased with proof of the purchaser paying for those securities.
Next they would have to prove that the purchaser that legally purchased them has held them from 12 to 24 months holding period at a minimum from the date of legal purchase when they proved monies were received for the purchase.
The attorney would also have to verify the securities that were purchase was not a gift according to the new SEC rules and that the company was in good standing at the time of purchase.
Now an SEC investigating attorney would have to sign off on these securities addmiting that the attorney and his team did this investigation under the laws of the SEC and the purchases has a legal basis to have these securities issue to him.
Now a Rule 144 Legsl Opinion Letters are good for 90 days to deposit those securities into an account. If additional time is needed then he would of had to get a 4ac1 Legal Opioni Letter and this is going into greater depths of investigation because now the securities are 100% free trading for ever.
Now let's address the TA not doing there job as you claim. The TA would have to take these legal opinion letters and run it by there legal department to be in compliance with the SEC and once they have passed the TAs legal compliance then the TA would sent it to the company and their attomery of record for the acknolgement of the company, not approval. If they Company and attorney disagree they are given 30days to provide a legal basis to stop that securities transfer, if they cannot provide a legal basis to stop that transfer then the TA must transfer those securities to the new party or it will be violating federal laws.
The Company and its attorney must follow the laws of the US. The TA cannot manipulate the facts and just because a company dosn't like the law.
With a TA there is nothing hidden, everything is transparent and according to the law.
No one can manipulate a TA to have shares put into someones name without proving under legal compliance of the SEC or they must go back to the company treasury.
Therefore the story may or may not have some truth but that would have been been back in 2014 - 8 years ago, you have completely lied and misconsrewed all the material facts to make the company look competent.
All of this information would have been in the shareholder list and acknowledge before the purchase of any company. It would have been legally impossible for what your saying to have happen.
Once again, nice spin to manipulate the market as your team is very good at.
I also notice of someone who called Contential Stocker Tranfer you didn't give any name of reference like I did with my DD and you just made a blanket BS claim with no reference to actual people who were talked to.
Nice SPIN MOVE
I can definitely see this going to court and will be tied up inlitagation.
My predictions for 2 to 3q 2022
1. Frank will fire Alision because he is broke and can't pay her anymore
2.Frank will try and cut a side deal to sell the Public Company to new buyers and screw all the shareholder
3. Frank will pump as much excitement as he can before he tries to sell the company and then do another pubco for Bitgift
4. Frank will try and distances himself as much as possible and lead people into other deals to take the eyes off of him
5. Franks Bitgift is behind the crypto times and is outdated in the crypto marekt. It's too far behind in the crypto space
